糖心原创

Home⇛Annals of Tropical Research⇛vol. 48 no. 1 (2026)

Influence of Membrane Thickness and Polyvinylpyrrolidone on Cellulose Acetate FO Membranes for Microalgae Harvesting

Aida Isama Mohamad Idris | Ma. Grace C. Sumaria | Fathima Hamaza Haseem Deen | Munira Mohammad

 

Abstract:

Background: Efficient and energy-saving microalgae harvesting is critical for sustainable biofuel production. Forward osmosis (FO) offers a low-energy alternative driven by osmotic pressure, where membrane characteristics such as porosity and hydrophilicity strongly influence performance. Objectives: This study aimed to fabricate and evaluate cellulose acetate (CA) membranes enhanced with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) for improved FO performance in microalgae harvesting. Methods: CA membranes were prepared via phase inversion with varying PVP concentrations (1g, 2g, and 3g) as a poreforming agent. Membranes with casting thicknesses of 200μm and 250μm were tested. Water flux and porosity were measured using distilled water as the feed solution and 1M NaCl as the draw solution. The optimal membrane was further tested with 5M and 6M NaCl solutions to evaluate microalgae concentration performance. Results: The membrane with 200μm thickness and 3g PVP -2 -1 demonstrated the highest water flux (2.5L m h ) and porosity (71%). Increased PVP content improved membrane hydrophilicity and pore structure, enhancing performance. In microalgae harvesting, he 6M NaCl draw solution generated higher water flux and biomass concentration than 5M NaCl due to its stronger osmotic gradient. The 6M NaCl achieved a biomass -1 -1 concentration of 848 ± 193mg L , compared to 575 ± 193mg L for the 5M solution. Conclusion: Optimizing membrane composition and draw solution concentration significantly improves FO efficiency. A CA membrane with 3g PVP at 200μm thickness, combined with a 6M NaCl draw solution, offers enhanced water flux and biomass concentration, demonstrating strong potential for energy-efficient microalgae harvesting.



References:

  1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, & Water Environment Federation. (2017). Method 2540 D: Total suspended solids dried at 103–105 °C. In Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). APHA Press.
  2. Chan, M. K., Ong, C. S., & Kumaran, P. (2018). Development and characterization of glycerol coating on PAN/PVDF composite membranes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 458, 012006.
  3. Eddouibi, P. J., Abdrafi, S., Vaudreuil, S., & Bounahmi, T. (2021). Water desalination by forward osmosis: Dynamic performance assessment and experimental validation using MgCl鈧� and NaCl as draw solutes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 152, 107313.
     
  4. Edwards, A. A., Steacy, L. M., Siegelman, N., Rigobon, V. M., Kearns, D. M., Rueckl, J. G., & Compton, D. L. (2022). Unpacking the unique relationship between set for variability and word reading development: Examining word- and child-level predictors of performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1242–1256.
  5. Elaissaoui, I., Sayeb, S., Ounif, I., Ferhi, M., Horchani-Naifer, K., & Ennigrou, D. J. (2024). Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate electrospun nanofibers membrane: Potential application in wastewater treatment. Heliyon, 10(12), e32552.
  6. Ennaceri, H., Fischer, K., Schulze, A., & Moheimani, N. R. (2022).Membrane fouling control for sustainable microalgal biodiesel production: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112335.
  7. Gubari, M. Q., Zwain, H.M., Hassan, W.H., & Vakili, M. (2023). Desalination of pigment industry wastewater by reverse osmosis using OPM-K membrane. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 8, 100401.
  8. Hafiz, M. A., Hawari, A. H., Das, P., Khan, S., & Altaee, A. (2020). Comparison of dual-stage ultrafiltration and hybrid ultrafiltration–forward osmosis process for harvesting microalgae (Tetraselmis sp.) biomass. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 157, 108112.
  9. Jalalian, N., & Nabavi, S. R. (2020). Electrosprayed chitosan nanoparticles decorated on polyamide 6 electrospun nanofibers as membrane for acid fuchsin dye filtration from water. Surfaces and Interfaces, 21, 100779.
  10. Khan, S., Naushad, M., Iqbal, J., Bathula, C., & Sharma, G. (2022). Production and harvesting of microalgae and an efficient operational approach to biofuel production for a sustainable environment. Fuel, 311, 122543.
  11. Liao, Y., Bokhary, A., Maleki, E., & Liao, B. (2018). A review of membrane fouling and its control in algal-related membrane processes. Bioresource Technology, 264, 343–358.
  12. Mkpuma, V. O., Moheimani, N. R., & Ennaceri, H. (2022). Microalgal dewatering with focus on filtration and antifouling strategies: A review. Algal Research, 61, 102588.
  13. Molitor, H. R., Schaeffer, A. K., & Schnoor, J. L. (2021). Sustainably cultivating and harvesting microalgae through sedimentation and forward osmosis using wastes. ACS Omega, 6(27), 17362–17371.
  14. Nawi, N. I. M., Afrin, S. N. H. M., Hizam, S. M., Rampun, E. L. A., Bilad, M. R., Elma, M., Khan, A. L., Wibisono, Y., & Jaafar, J. (2020). Chlorella vulgaris broth harvesting via standalone forward osmosis using seawater draw solution. Results in Engineering, 9, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100394
  15. Zhang, B., Peng, C., Zhang, S., Zang, M., Li, D., Wang, X., & Mao, B. (2023). Comprehensive analysis of the combined flocculation and filtration process for microalgae harvesting at various operating parameters. Science of the Total Environment, 857, 159658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159658
  16. Shang, M., & Shi, B. (2018). Study on preparation and performances of cellulose acetate forward osmosis membrane. Chemical Papers, 72(12), 3159–3167.
  17. Teixeira, M. S., Speranza, L. G., da Silva, I. C., Moruzzi, R. B., & Silva, G. H. R. (2022). Tannin-based coagulant for harvesting microalgae cultivated in wastewater: Efficiency, floc morphology and products characterization. Science of the Total Environment, 807, 150776.
  18. Udayan, A., Sirohi, R., Sreekumar, N., Sang, B., & Jun, S. J. (2022). Mass cultivation and harvesting of microalgal biomass: Current trends and future perspectives. Bioresource Technology, 344, 126406.
  19. Ummalyma, S. B., Sirohi, R., Udayan, A., Yadav, P., Raj, A., Sim, S. J., & Pandey, A. (2022). Sustainable microalgal biomass production in food industry wastewater for low-cost biorefinery products: A review. Phytochemistry Reviews, 22, 969-991.
  20. Yang, Y., Gao, X., Li, Z., Wang, Q., Dong, S., Wang, X., Ma, Z., Wang, L., Wang, X., & Gao, C. (2018). Porous membranes in pressure-assisted forward osmosis: Flux behavior and potential applications. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 60, 160–168.
  21. Yazdanabad, S. K., Samimi, A., Shokrollahzadeh, S., Mohebbi Kalhori, D., Moazami, N., Ibáñez González, M. J., Sobczuk, T. M., & Molina Grima, E. (2021). Microalgae biomass dewatering by forward osmosis: Review and critical challenges. Algal Research, 56, 102323.
  22. Zhang, J., Li, Y., Shao, E., Chow, V., Li, J., Qian, J., Xu, P., Li, J., Song, H., Zhou, W., & Shao, S. (2023). Feasibility and constraints of edible fungi bio-flocculating microalgae. Algal Research, 70, 103004.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  糖心原创 Exclusively distributed by