糖心原创

Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 34 no. 9 (2025)

Attitude, Subjective Norms and Teachers’ Effectiveness in Handling Learners with Difficulty in Applying Knowledge

Rhia Genn Cosme帽o

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Teacher ineffectiveness in addressing the needs of learners with difficulty in applying knowledge remains a critical global concern. This study explored the influence of teacher attitudes and subjective norms on their effectiveness in supporting learners with learning difficulties, particularly in knowledge application. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior, the study sought to determine whether these psychological factors significantly impact instructional effectiveness. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing multiple linear regression analysis to examine relationships among variables. Data were gathered from 230 randomly selected teachers through adapted and researcher-developed survey instruments assessing attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived effectiveness in addressing the needs of struggling learners. Findings revealed a significant positive relationship between teacher attitudes, subjective norms, and their effectiveness in handling students with learning difficulties. Specifically, teachers with more positive attitudes and stronger subjective norms exhibited higher levels of instructional effectiveness. These results underscore the importance of fostering supportive professional environments and promoting positive perceptions toward teaching learners with learning difficulties. By confirming the applicability of the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study contributes to the growing body of research on teacher effectiveness in inclusive education. The findings highlight the need for targeted professional development programs to enhance teachers’ attitudes and strengthen supportive social expectations to improve learning outcomes for students with knowledge application difficulties.



References:

  1. Ahammed, H. A. (2021). Challenges faced by teachers of learners with learning disability. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 9(2), 294-312.
  2. Ahmad, A. B., Butt, A. S., Chen, D., & Liu, B. (2023). A mediated model of the effect of organizational culture on the intentions to engage in change-supportive behaviors: Insights from the theory of planned behavior.      Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 345–365.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.         69746-3_2
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  5. Akram, M. (2018). Development and validation of school teacher effectiveness questionnaire. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 12(2), 154–174. Retrieved from
  6. Akram, M., Malik, M. I., & Ullah, S. (2023). Using students’ ratings to compare teacher effectiveness in English and mathematics. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 330-340.        I).30
  7. Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and challenges in special education: A qualitative analysis from teacher’s perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 37-49.
  8. Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A., & Milhem, M. (2024, July). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing school culture and teaching performance in Yemeni public schools. In Frontiers in Education            (Vol. 9, p. 1413607). Frontiers Media SA.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1413607
  9. Bandura, A. (2023). Cultivate self鈥恊fficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. Principles of organizational behavior: The handbook of evidence鈥恇ased management (3rd ed., pp. 113-135). Wiley.
  10. Belay, S., & Melesse, T. (2024). Exploring the link between teachers’ motivation for continuous professional development and professional learning communities: A structural equation modeling approach. SAGE Open, 14(3).
  11. Bevans, R. (2020). Multiple linear regression: A quick guide (examples). Scribbr.
  12. Bhandari, P. (2020). Descriptive statistics: Definitions, types, examples. Scribbr.
  13. Bhandari, P. (2021). Random vs. systematic error: Definition & examples. Scribbr.
  14. Bhandari, P. (2024). How to calculate standard deviation (guide) | Calculator & examples. Scribbr.
  15. Bisht, R. (2024). Qualitative vs. quantitative research: Differences, examples, and methods. Researcher.Life.
  16. Bjorklund, P., Daly, A. J., Ambrose, R., & van Es, E. A. (2020). Connections and capacity: An exploration of preservice teachers’ sense of belonging, social networks, and self-efficacy in three teacher education programs. AERA Open, 6(1).
  17. Cansoy, R., Parlar, H., & Polatcan, M. (2020). Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in        Education, 25(6), 900–918.
  18. Chen, X., Zhong, J., Luo, M., & Lu, M. (2020). Academic self-efficacy, social support, and professional identity among preservice special education teachers in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 374.            
  19. Chen, X. X., & Slade, E. (2024). Theory of planned behaviour: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed.), Theory Hub Book. OpenNCL.
  20. Cherry, K. (2023). Correlation studies in psychology research: Determining the relationship between two or more variables. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from     2795774
  21. Cherry, K. (2024). The components of attitude: Formation of an attitude and how it can be changed. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from
  22. Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2020). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40.
  23. Cruz, K. E. (2021). Strategies for stressed teachers to solve challenges in the diverse classroom. Thompson Rivers       University.
  24. 膼ali膰, I., & Terzi膰, S. (2021). Violation of the assumption of homoscedasticity and detection of heteroscedasticity.    Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 1–18.  
  25. Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., van den Bergh, L., & Bijlstra, G. (2022). A review of implicit measures of teachers’ attitudes and stereotypes and their effects on teacher practice and student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 78, 101437.
  26. Dewaele, J. M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research,    25(6), 922–945.
  27. Fabelico, F., & Afalla, B. (2020). Perseverance and passion in the teaching profession: Teachers’ grit, self-    efficacy, burnout, and performance. Journal of Critical Reviews. Available at SSRN:
  28. Frost, J. (2022). Standard deviation: Interpretations and calculations. Statistics by Jim.          
  29. Gonzaga, N., Plan, L., & Aguipo, M. (2024). Readiness and challenges of general education teachers on the implementation of inclusive education. Russian Law Journal, 12(1), 8–26.
  30. Grecu, Y. V. (2022). Overcoming obstacles to differentiate instruction when implementing prepared curricular resources in a diverse classroom. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(1), 167–180.      
  31. Hayes, A. (2024). Multiple linear regression (MLR) definition, formula, and example. Investopedia.
  32. 陌nce, M. (2023). Examining the role of motivation, attitude, and self-efficacy beliefs in shaping secondary school students’ academic achievement in science course. Sustainability, 15(15), 11612.
  33. Kalkan, F., & Da臒l谋, E. (2021). The relationships between school climate, school belonging, and school burnout in secondary school students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(4), 59–79.
  34. Kangas-Dick, K., & O’Shaughnessy, E. (2020). Interventions that promote resilience among teachers: A           systematic review of the literature. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 8(2), 131–146.
  35. Kenton, W. (2024). Durbin-Watson test: What is it in statistics, with examples? Investopedia. Retrieved from
  36. Kilag, O. K., Uy, F., Dela Cerna, Y. M., Doroy, E., Gomez, H. M., Riveral, A., & Castañares, J. (2024). Special education: Challenges faced by teachers in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of      Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence, 1(7), 92–98.      
  37. Knief, U., & Forstmeier, W. (2021). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior         Research Methods, 53(6), 2576–2590.
  38. Koenen, A. K., Spilt, J. L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2022). Understanding teachers’ experiences of classroom            relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109,103573.
  39. La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2020). Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 401–417.
  40. Lauermann, F., & ten Hagen, I. (2021). Do teachers’ perceived teaching competence and self-efficacy affect students’ academic outcomes? A c        loser look at student-reported classroom processes and outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 265–282.
  41. Liu, Y., Belliba艧, M. 艦., & Gümü艧, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453.
  42. Lorensius, L., Anggal, N., & Lugan, S. (2022). Academic supervision in the improvement of teachers’ professional competencies: Effective practices on the emergence. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(2), 99–107.
  43. Ma, K., Chutiyami, M., & Nicoll, S. (2022). Transitioning into the first year of       teaching: Changes and sources of teacher self-efficacy. Australian Educational Researcher, 49, 943–960.
  44. Mali, K. (2023). Everything you need to know about linear regression. Analytics Vidhya. Retrieved July 10, 2024, from
  45. Mallillin, L. (2021). Teacher theory and adaptable model: An application to the teaching profession. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12).
  46. Márquez, D. (2024). From probability to convergence: Exploring the foundations of the central limit theorem. University of Barcelona. Retrieved from
  47. Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research design. Archives of           Business Review, 8(11), 180–193.
  48. Nor, A., Yusuf, M., & Arabi, I. (2024). Strategies for improving the professionalism of Islamic education teachers at university. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(1), 41–61.
  49. Opoku, M. P., Cuskelly, M., Pedersen, S. J., & Rayner, C. S. (2020). Applying the theory of planned behavior in assessments of teachers’ intentions towards practicing inclusive education: A scoping review. European           Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(4), 577–592.
  50. Ortan, F., Simut, C., & Simut, R. (2021). Self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and teacher well-being in the K-12       educational system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12763.
  51. Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2021). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer,      37(1), 107–136.
  52. Sahli Lozano, C., Sharma, U., & Wüthrich, S. (2021). A comparison of Australian and Swiss secondary school teachers’ attitudes, concerns, self-efficacy,     and intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms: Does the context matter? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(7), 1205–1223.
  53. Sansom, R. (2021). Theory of planned behavior. ASCN Higher Education. Retrieved from
  54. Thomas, L. (2023). Simple random sampling: Definition, steps, & examples. Scribbr. Retrieved from
  55. Turney, S. (2022). Pearson correlation coefficient ®: Guide & examples. Scribbr. Retrieved from
  56. Wang, X., Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2024). Relationships between self-efficacy and teachers’ well-being in middle school English teachers: The mediating role of teaching satisfaction and resilience. Behavioral   Sciences, 14(8), 629.
  57. Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward          inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109,         103521.
  58. Yumiko, K., El Madani, Y. E. A., Oughdir, L., & Dakkak, A. (2020). A multiple linear regression-based approach to predict student performance. In Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2019) (pp. 9–23). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  糖心原创 Exclusively distributed by