糖心原创

Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

Visitors’ Perception of the Importance and Performance of Multisensory Dimensions: The Case of the Philippine National Museum of Natural History

Alvin P. Murillo | Ma. Cristina R. Williams

Discipline: management studies

 

Abstract:

Museums are vital in preserving cultural and historical heritage while offering immersive learning experiences. However, enhancing visitor engagement and satisfaction remains a challenge. This study examines the impact of multisensory dimensions in improving the museum experience at the National Museum of Natural History. Using a quantitative-descriptive approach and purposive sampling of 355 respondents, data were collected through structured questionnaires. The Importance-Performance Analysis Model was applied to assess the significance of visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile stimuli in shaping visitor experiences. The hypothesis test rejected the null hypothesis, confirming a significant relationship between the perceived importance and the actual performance of multisensory dimensions. Findings indicate that integrating multiple sensory elements enhances visitor engagement, improves recollection of information, and fosters a deeper appreciation of exhibits. These results suggest that aligning sensory features with visitor expectations strengthens interpretation, making museum visits more meaningful and immersive.



References:

  1. Antle, A. N., Tanenbaum, J., Girouard, A., & Robinson, M. (2023). Understanding museum visitors’ engagement with tangible and embodied interaction. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 1–12). ACM.
  2. Bem, M. J., Chabot, S. R. V., & Braasch, J. (2023). Effects of sounds on the visitors’ experience in museums. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(4_supplement), A257.
  3. Bishop, M. (2017). Inspire: Understanding scent inclusion in museum settings (Master’s thesis). University of Washington.
  4. Bitgood, S. (2014). An attention-value model of museum visitors. Jacksonville State University.
  5. Christidou, D., & Pierroux, P. (2018). Art, touch, and meaning making: An analysis of multisensory interpretation in the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(1), 96–115.
  6. Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: The cultural history of smell. Routledge.
  7. Cliffe, C., Osden, C., & Holosonics. (2024). Immersive soundscapes: Transforming visitor experiences across iconic exhibits. American Alliance of Museums. Retrieved from
  8. Coda to Coda. (2023). Natural history museum: Animal interventions. Medium. Retrieved from
  9. Eardley, A. F., Mineiro, C., Neves, J., & Ride, P. (2016). Redefining access: Embracing multimodality, memorability, and shared experience in museums. Curator of the Museum Journal, 59(3), 263–286.
  10. Ehrich, S. C. (2024). Stimulating the senses: Using smell to engage visitors. Thinking Museum. Retrieved from
  11. Elangovan, N., & Padma, C. (2017). Impact of multi-sensory marketing on consumer behaviour in restaurants. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(2), 1–9.
  12. Exploratorium. (n.d.). Visit the tactile dome. Retrieved from
  13. Groth, H. (2020). Literary soundscapes. In A. Snaith (Ed.), Sound and literature (pp. 135–153). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hayhoe, S., Nolan, C., & Palmer, S. (2022). Co-designing touch: Tactile exhibition design for blind and low-vision visitors. Journal of Museum Education, 47(2), 198–209.
  15. Kokko, T.-E. (2019). Internal and external multisensory branding: A framework and a method for establishing multisensory brand image (Master’s thesis). University of Jyväskylä.
  16. Levent, N., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2014). The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory, and space. Rowman & Littlefield.
  17. Luo, D., Doucé, L., & Nys, K. (2024). Multisensory museum experience: An integrative view and future research directions. Museum Management and Curatorship, 1–28.
  18. Mansell, J. (2017). A chamber of noise horrors: Sound, technology, and the museum. Science Museum Group Journal, 7(7).
  19. Mu, X., Bem, M. J., Chabot, S. R. V., & Braasch, J. (2022). Enhancing museum experiences: The impact of sounds on visitor perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(4_supplement), A257.
  20. Nieuwhof, A. (2016). Olfactory experiences in museums of modern and contemporary art: Smell as a new curatorial strategy (Master’s thesis). Leiden University
  21. Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Space, place, and atmosphere. Emotion and peripheral perception in architectural experience. Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience, 4(4).
  22. Rogowski, M. (2016). The multi-sensory landscape as an inspiration in the creation of a tourism product. Turyzm/Tourism, 26(2), 23–32.
  23. Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. (2020). Sant Ocean Hall. Smithsonian Institution.
  24. Sound Directions. (2010). Bruce Nauman: Raw materials. Tate Modern. Retrieved from
  25. Spence, C. (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1).
  26. Vaz, R., Freitas, D., & Coelho, A. (2020). Perspectives of visually impaired visitors on museums: Towards an integrative and multisensory framework to enhance the museum experience. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, 17–21.
  27. Wang, S. (2020). Museum as a sensory space: A discussion of the communication effect of multi-senses in Taizhou Museum. Sustainability, 12(7), 3061.
  28. Yalowitz, S. S., & Bronnenkant, K. (2009). Timing and tracking: Unlocking visitor behavior. Visitor Studies, 12(1), 47–64. .
  29. Ye, H., & Tussyadiah, I. P. (2011). Destination visual image and expectation of experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(2), 129–144.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  糖心原创 Exclusively distributed by